Letter from Robert Hooke to Gottfried Leibnitz. Reference number: EL/H3/64. Date: 15 May 1681.

Original source: The Royal Society: Science in the Making


p1

Sr.

I am extreamly pleased to find so excellent a Person as the Learned world must acknowledg Mr Leibnitz to concur in the same opinion wth me that a language somewh like that of ye Bishop of Chester would be of use for the Promotion of Science. It has been long my Judgment and that founded upon undenyable principles from [which?] I cannot [deviate?] that this language would be of much greater use than the world has conceived, though I have hitherto had the ill fortune scarcly to meet w one man (except himself) whom I can persuade to concur wth me. [Yet?] the greatest number look upon it only as a chymera and at best but a supplement for Latine in the inner parts of Europe, or for the Lingua Franca in the maritime. Yet my aymes have always been much higher, [viz.,?] to make it not only useful for Expressing & Remembering of things and notions but to Direct, Regulate, assist and even necessitate & compell the mind to find out and comprehend wtsoever is knowable. And to make it the an Instrument which may being actuated by the power of the mind shall most certainly produce the defined effect or plainly shew the Impossibility thereof, especially in all those subjects where the use of it may be free and where Interest and Authority doe not Intercept the Regular Course thereof, which I conceive to be the great antagonists which may impede its progress; preposession may clogg it but it will get through safe & well notwhstanding. It may therefore not unfitly be called the Algebra of Algebras or the Science of Methods, which every one that now invents a particular method does somewt participate, but comes short of the full perfection and [?] of that kind. At least if he lights on it he knows not how he came by it nor can he prove that tis so and not otherwise. Any thing therefore that Mr Leibnitz knows that will promote this end will be highly acceptable if he please to communicate it and shall be acknowledged as his. The great difficulty lyes in the media but the generall method will not only plainely shew what those are [and?] the way of attaining them, but this is not to be done in many subjects but wth much exercises of the methods and there is a subordination and positure in the Subjects of Inquiry themselves, and therefore the first Alphabet or those which may be called the Symbols are first to be understood, then those which may be called the Syllables + then the words then sentences or propositions &c. Nor is it to be imagined a Scoller in this art shall at first sight read perfectly, but might with Labour & Patience proceed methodically, and goe by Steps from subject to subject as Nature has placed them in order, and then tis not to be doubted but the Soule of man may be carryed to the highest step of knowledge and comprehend scientifically whatever tis made capable of knowing. To compleat which the united labours of many will be necessary and of such as are fitly qualified and those often Meeting and Debating together, and exerting their utmost abilitys in the right way. But where are these to be found? Either will or ability or opportunity or some other necessary concomitant is found wanting; p2 soe that I fear this may be seen in Speculation but twill be very difficult to bring it into act. And every one must be content himself to improve himself soe far as he can in the disquisition on this or that subject he has most present need of knowing. I question not but Mr Leibnitz may have many of those specimens by him and therefore I doe heartily wish you could prevail wh him to Communicate some of those which would be a means to persuade severall yet incredulous of the possibility of such a Science. For my own part I should very gladly contribute my [industry?] toward this end but the Difficulty Scarcity of Persons to converse wh concerning it does almost discourage me. But the concurrence & confirmation of soe excellent a Person as Monr Leibnitz would be very provident for making Proselyts!


Lr to Mr Leibnitz. 1681. May 19.

Concerning Mr Leibnitz, his Dessigne for an Universall Language or Character. Sent by Mr Hook to Mr Leibnitz May 19, 1681.