Why did you choose to present the decision of Jennings as a done deal?
What sort of a reaction did you expect to the announcement?
What were the board's initial perceptions of the public outcry?  How representative were they perceived to be?
How did the board react internally to the protests?
What sort of feedback did the board receive from the participation mechanisms in the second selection process?
What was the participation process and why was it chosen?
How varied were the boardmembers' opinions of and reaction to events?
What was the board perception of the media's role?  And how did it change over time?
How do you feel the later finalists compared to Jennings in terms of quality?
What lessons did you learn from the ordeal?